Talk:OGF:Federal States/Collaborative States/Massodeya
Hi! I think we might want to have more variety in population caps in Level 1 counties. Even though the system helps keeps population from overflowing (great job, btw), there's going to be an overwhelming majority of counties that have populations of around 59,900. I would put it from 10,000 to 80,000 or maybe have some special counties that have even less- several counties in Northern Nebraska have less than 1,000 residents, and Loving County, Texas's population is looming somewhere over 100 right now. Just a suggestion, and I hope the Massodeyas go well! :D --Megacity2005Creator (talk) 21:28, 8 August 2019 (CEST)
- These counties are also significantly larger than most counties. Loving County, TX is 677 square miles; the smallest West Massodeya county (Two Rivers) is nearly three times that size. Even if Two Rivers County reaches its population cap, the county's density would still be only about 40 persons per square mile, which is pretty consistent (and actually a little more sparse) with rural farming areas in the American Midwest. -TheMayor (talk) 17:46, 9 August 2019 (CEST)
FS-51 is marked as reserved until additional development occurs in the East Central Region on OGF:Federal States/Highways. Would FS-51 somehow stop short of the Massodeyas? Was it simply forgotten in the plan? --Yoyo21 (talk) 21:30, 16 August 2019 (CEST)
- The FS-51 corridor in this area will depend on how AR120-34 develops. The Bridgeport-Rollins Bridge-Casparis-Junction City-Strauss corridor looks natural to me, but it's also possible FS-51 never crosses FS-44. I know this isn't a helpful response, but right now it's too soon to say. -TheMayor (talk) 21:40, 16 August 2019 (CEST)
where can we put our county flags on here?
- I don't really have a spot for those yet. Put it in a new section on OGF:Federal States/Collaborative States/Massodeya/West Massodeya for now and I'll incorporate it into the West Massodeya wiki page somehow. --Yoyo21 (talk) 20:03, 14 October 2019 (CEST)