For anyone reading this page, note that I have been blocked at 11:50 today by Thilo. I do not know the reason for this block. I have contacted Thilo and admin for information, but have not received a reply.
As experience with Wikipedia has shown, imposing blocks on users is a drastic measure. I don't think I've done anything against the rules of OGF, and without knowing what the reason behind the block is, I can't say whether its legitimate or not. At the time of the block I was editing pages to make links between OGF pages work better.
However this is resolved, I think OGF needs to have a much clearer policy on blocks, as Wikipedia does, taking account especially the purpose of the block and the transparency of the block process.
- I agree, there are a few users I would actually love to see blocked especially from the forum and the diaries, but not you. And not even bothering to provide an explanation for an action like this is not only nontransparent, it's simply rude. --Eklas (talk) 18:52, 18 December 2017 (CET)
It appears the block was an error, made in haste. I'd encourage the admins to take greater care with this. Firstly, all blocks should give a reason. Secondly, there should be a protocol for instigating blocks, as per Wikipedia.
- I've seen that you've been blocked and I actually tried to figure out the reason behind it, but I didn't find any. Our admins are working really hard these days and mistakes like these can easily happen I guess --Stjur (talk • OGF) 20:34, 18 December 2017 (CET)
I blocked you for unnecessarily moving the "OGF:Coastline Maintenance" page and the subsequent edits to several of other users' pages. In hindsight that was a bit of an overreaction, but I happened to be at work with no time to evaluate the situation more thoroughly. Sorry for the inconvenience caused to you, but in a similar situation I might feel compelled to react this way again. --Thilo (talk) 22:06, 18 December 2017 (CET)
Thanks for adding Demacian template. I never worked with Wiki engine yet. Let's see how it marks comments left here. Okay seems I have to add timestamp manually. --Ragekwa (talk) 16:17, 23 January 2015 (CET)
- No problem. Signature is second from right on the bar above the edit page - if you didn't see that --Udilugbuldigu (talk) 16:30, 23 January 2016 (CET)
- Let's test--Ragekwa (talk) 16:35, 23 January 2016 (CET)
- Thanks Demuth. The template is at: http://opengeofiction.net/wiki/index.php/Template:Bias_box_122015 (that gives December 2015 as the date of the note). Feel free to use it if you have controversial articles! --Udilugbuldigu (talk) 16:38, 8 December 2015 (CET)
Telkhug Ēkdŭn anarchists in Olaconia Crisis
Hi. I come to answer your questions about the Olaconia Crisis. First, no, Stenness is still not informed about it but I'll get it to him, as we said at first that Olaciona was an unstable country that rejects the monarchy Riko.
This instability, citizens were divided into pro monarchy, republicans and anarchists who reject Balam control and Riko (and NA) over the territory.
Your organization may have influence in this conflict so radical, that discontent with Riko took violent things and that causes Antonina bombing and invasion by Riko.
Olaconians civilians take refuge in Balam and generated a humanitarian crisis that forces Balam and Riko negotiate. Riko would intervene militarily and put order and Balam administers the autonomous community territory to prevent future riots.
of those negotiations, born ULP to avoid instability in Liberian Peninsula.
this is my idea, which could be modified as stenes and if you want to join.
Thank you Anakes (please sign!)!
It sounds good to me that Telkhug Ēkdŭn operatives could be involved in some way, bearing in mind that any operation would not be condoned by Telkhug Ē, and that these would be 'rogue operatives' no longer members of the organisation, if they ever were.
As I understand it then, Olaconia is now an autonomous territory, administered by Balam-Utz with a large native Mayan (though that could be a rw ethnicity so should be changed) majority in its population. What happened to the losing factions in the conflict - I think that is Riko nationalists, and republicans, plus 'independent' anarchists. There would be other factions supporting independence for Olaconia? Finally, should this be a cause for ongoing 'bad-blood' between ULP and Telkhug Ēkdŭn - how 'final' was the end of this conflict? --Udilugbuldigu (talk) 15:58, 8 January 2016 (CET)