Difference between revisions of "Talk:Federal Motorway 11 in Arlington"

From OpenGeofiction Encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
 
Line 1: Line 1:
 
WOuldn't it make sense to just have one page for a route (including all states)? Plus I would thing calling a page "FS-XX" would make the most sense. [[User:Brunanter|Brunanter]] ([[User talk:Brunanter|talk]]) 22:14, 13 November 2019 (CET)
 
WOuldn't it make sense to just have one page for a route (including all states)? Plus I would thing calling a page "FS-XX" would make the most sense. [[User:Brunanter|Brunanter]] ([[User talk:Brunanter|talk]]) 22:14, 13 November 2019 (CET)
 
:Even writing one article about FS-11 for all the states might be borderline overwikification (given the expected basic quality of our wiki). --[[User:Yoyo21|Yoyo21]] ([[User talk:Yoyo21|talk]]) 02:32, 14 November 2019 (CET)
 
:Even writing one article about FS-11 for all the states might be borderline overwikification (given the expected basic quality of our wiki). --[[User:Yoyo21|Yoyo21]] ([[User talk:Yoyo21|talk]]) 02:32, 14 November 2019 (CET)
 +
::I don't think it would be (it pertains to mapping, and shows data and info organized), but multiple pages for different portions of the same route, with potentially different naming standards (vs. a single one one agreed upon) would be too much. [[User:Brunanter|Brunanter]] ([[User talk:Brunanter|talk]]) 21:37, 14 November 2019 (CET)
 
Err writing about a motorway which exists on the map is ok, though if yall want to you can even make it part of a series of motorways from FS-10 to FS-20 for example. Or just under an iverall list of FS motorways is possible.--[[User:Zhenkang|Happy mapping and God blesses you, ZK]] ([[User talk:Zhenkang|talk]]) 02:44, 14 November 2019 (CET)
 
Err writing about a motorway which exists on the map is ok, though if yall want to you can even make it part of a series of motorways from FS-10 to FS-20 for example. Or just under an iverall list of FS motorways is possible.--[[User:Zhenkang|Happy mapping and God blesses you, ZK]] ([[User talk:Zhenkang|talk]]) 02:44, 14 November 2019 (CET)

Latest revision as of 21:37, 14 November 2019

WOuldn't it make sense to just have one page for a route (including all states)? Plus I would thing calling a page "FS-XX" would make the most sense. Brunanter (talk) 22:14, 13 November 2019 (CET)

Even writing one article about FS-11 for all the states might be borderline overwikification (given the expected basic quality of our wiki). --Yoyo21 (talk) 02:32, 14 November 2019 (CET)
I don't think it would be (it pertains to mapping, and shows data and info organized), but multiple pages for different portions of the same route, with potentially different naming standards (vs. a single one one agreed upon) would be too much. Brunanter (talk) 21:37, 14 November 2019 (CET)

Err writing about a motorway which exists on the map is ok, though if yall want to you can even make it part of a series of motorways from FS-10 to FS-20 for example. Or just under an iverall list of FS motorways is possible.--Happy mapping and God blesses you, ZK (talk) 02:44, 14 November 2019 (CET)