Forum:Federal States/Revised FS Business Route Shields: Difference between revisions
m Voting (Yes I was told you can vote for things you suggested) |
|||
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
How exactly would these be tagged in order to differentiate them on the map, be it Americana or otherwise? [[User:PoisonDog522|PoisonDog522]] ([[User talk:PoisonDog522|talk]]) 19:09, 30 August 2025 (UTC) | How exactly would these be tagged in order to differentiate them on the map, be it Americana or otherwise? [[User:PoisonDog522|PoisonDog522]] ([[User talk:PoisonDog522|talk]]) 19:09, 30 August 2025 (UTC) | ||
:From my understanding it is quite easy to have a predefined shield that can apply to anything in a similar "network" on the Americana map. So, if there is enough desire to do it, I believe we could ask Infinatious to include it as he has other custom shields. It would be up to him to do the work, so I would not take that for granted. As for the mechanical on our side, however, it is something we could do easily. For example, if we were to have <code>network=FSA:FS:BUS</code> as the nationwide 'generic' solid-green, we could potentially also have <code>network=FSA:FS:BL</code>, <code>network=FSA:FS:BS</code>, and <code>network=FSA:FS:BR</code> for loops, spurs, and other routes explicitly defined. From that standpoint, it is quite simple. Beyond the Americana map, it is mostly lore otherwise. — [[User:Alessa|Alessa]] <sub>([[User talk:Alessa|talk]])</sub> 01:47, 31 August 2025 (UTC) | :From my understanding it is quite easy to have a predefined shield that can apply to anything in a similar "network" on the Americana map. So, if there is enough desire to do it, I believe we could ask Infinatious to include it as he has other custom shields. It would be up to him to do the work, so I would not take that for granted. As for the mechanical on our side, however, it is something we could do easily. For example, if we were to have <code>network=FSA:FS:BUS</code> as the nationwide 'generic' solid-green, we could potentially also have <code>network=FSA:FS:BL</code>, <code>network=FSA:FS:BS</code>, and <code>network=FSA:FS:BR</code> for loops, spurs, and other routes explicitly defined. From that standpoint, it is quite simple. Beyond the Americana map, it is mostly lore otherwise. — [[User:Alessa|Alessa]] <sub>([[User talk:Alessa|talk]])</sub> 01:47, 31 August 2025 (UTC) | ||
Since the motorway system does not allow for spur routes in general, it is unlikely that Business Spurs would be prevalent or even encouraged, and since there would only be “loops”, it seems superfluous to change the shields. -[[User:TheMayor|TheMayor]] ([[User talk:TheMayor|talk]]) 16:02, 31 August 2025 (UTC) | |||
==Voting== | ==Voting== | ||
Revision as of 16:02, 31 August 2025
| File:Logo vote.svg | Voting will remain open until 23:59 UTC on 13 September 2025 To vote, click here to go to the voting area, and add your signature by typing four tildes (~) without spaces. |

Hello! I'm offering a proposed revision to update the FS Business Route shields by adding words to clarify their purpose. RhodeIslandWV (talk) 01:30, 8 August 2025 (UTC)
Discussion
I think these are perfectly fine as an alternate shield to the solid green one. I support a measure that would allow states to choose these as an option while not outright replacing the solid-green shield. I also like that the word on the bottom can be flexible (loop, spur, route, etc.), which does add for the ability for states to define how they want to use them if they even have such a classification. — Alessa (talk) 16:19, 30 August 2025 (UTC)
How exactly would these be tagged in order to differentiate them on the map, be it Americana or otherwise? PoisonDog522 (talk) 19:09, 30 August 2025 (UTC)
- From my understanding it is quite easy to have a predefined shield that can apply to anything in a similar "network" on the Americana map. So, if there is enough desire to do it, I believe we could ask Infinatious to include it as he has other custom shields. It would be up to him to do the work, so I would not take that for granted. As for the mechanical on our side, however, it is something we could do easily. For example, if we were to have
network=FSA:FS:BUSas the nationwide 'generic' solid-green, we could potentially also havenetwork=FSA:FS:BL,network=FSA:FS:BS, andnetwork=FSA:FS:BRfor loops, spurs, and other routes explicitly defined. From that standpoint, it is quite simple. Beyond the Americana map, it is mostly lore otherwise. — Alessa (talk) 01:47, 31 August 2025 (UTC)
Since the motorway system does not allow for spur routes in general, it is unlikely that Business Spurs would be prevalent or even encouraged, and since there would only be “loops”, it seems superfluous to change the shields. -TheMayor (talk) 16:02, 31 August 2025 (UTC)
Voting
| File:Symbol important note.svg Important technical notes to users |
|---|
| If you are an FSA state-owner or state coordinator, please vote below. To vote, sign your name by placing four tildes (~~~~) on a new line under your preferred option. Ineligible votes will be removed. |
Please choose one (1) option below.
Yes, I approve adding the proposed shield as an alternate version of the Federal Business Route shield
Note: The existing solid-green shield would remain an option for states to still use and is not impacted by this vote.
- RhodeIslandWV (talk) 15:12, 31 August 2025 (UTC)
No, I do not approve adding the proposed shield as an alternate version of the Federal Business Route shield