Forum:Federal States/Revised FS Business Route Shields
 | Voting will remain open until 23:59 UTC on 13 September 2025 To vote, click here to go to the voting area, and add your signature by typing four tildes (~) without spaces. |
Hello! I'm offering a proposed revision to update the FS Business Route shields by adding words to clarify their purpose. RhodeIslandWV (talk) 01:30, 8 August 2025 (UTC)
Discussion
I think these are perfectly fine as an alternate shield to the solid green one. I support a measure that would allow states to choose these as an option while not outright replacing the solid-green shield. I also like that the word on the bottom can be flexible (loop, spur, route, etc.), which does add for the ability for states to define how they want to use them if they even have such a classification. — Alessa (talk) 16:19, 30 August 2025 (UTC)
Voting
| File:Symbol important note.svg Important technical notes to users |
|---|
| If you are an FSA state-owner or state coordinator, please vote below. To vote, sign your name by placing four tildes (~~~~) on a new line under your preferred option. Ineligible votes will be removed. |
Please choose one (1) option below.
Yes, I approve adding the proposed shield as an alternate version of the Federal Business Route shield
Note: The existing solid-green shield would remain an option for states to still use and is not impacted by this vote.
- Placeholder. If you are the first voter, please replace the text after the hashtag with four tildes (your signature) to remove the placeholder.
No, I do not approve adding the proposed shield as an alternate version of the Federal Business Route shield
- Placeholder. If you are the first voter, please replace the text after the hashtag with four tildes (your signature) to remove the placeholder.