Jump to content

Forum:Global and regional issues/Future of Transuletha region

From OpenGeofiction
ForumsGlobal and regional issues → Global and regional issues/Future of Transuletha region


Substantive

Purpose

In this thread, I would like to discuss the nature of the Transulethan region and surrounds. Currently, this region generally is not as active but some discussion might prep this up to be a much more cohesive region in the future.

Some examples of the potential offered by Transuletha include importantly bridging the gap between West Uletha, providing real-world equivalents to European cultures, and East Uletha, notably having a large portion being based on real-world Japan or Asia in general, whilst also providing the opportunity to integrate cultures, notably the presence of Indo-Iranian ones.

Historically, this area would also be a significant area of marine trade and general exchange, meaning that some consideration would have to be taken when determining the ethnicities and cultures present in each country.

Currently, what we do have include Midistland in the northern part of Transuletha, which seems to be predominantly Kalmish which does transition to a nonowned territory that has a Hindi conlang (UL26f) so this is an inconsistency that may need to be addressed. Niulutan-Riu also seems to be Sri Lankan though it is very inactive.

Where is this?

Specifically, the current active territories that I would like to include in this discussion are Gobrassanya (collaborative), Midistland (collaborative), Khaiwoon (archived), Niulutan-Riu (collaborative), Suvuma (collaborative?), Sephyra (private) and Maj Lagar (private) though I would highly encourage any other stakeholders such as in the 'Asian sector' of East Uletha and around Demirhanli Empire to participate since Transuletha exists at the crossroads of these regions.

Members of Discussion

If you wish to be a participating member of this discussion and you think your country is crucial to the development of Transuletha, please put your country below.

Country User(s)

Discussion