Forum:Territory application/UL05m, Lucetia

Forums → Territory application → Territory application/UL05m, Lucetia

Please fill in the information below to make a territory request.

File:Noun Project Signature icon 619326 cc.svg	Territory ID and proposed name
	The Territory ID (from OpenGeofiction:Territories, e.g. AR123a) and proposed name of the country

UL08m UL05m, Lucetia

File:Noun Project Map icon 1463108.svg	Physical geography
	An overview of climate, topography and landscape of the country. With the exception of Beginner territories, you should always create a sketch map to illustrate & explain your plans. You can add a link to this (hosted on imgBB, Postimages or similar, but not imgur.com)

Mostly a river delta with hills to the north. St. Richards will sit at the Pretanic Lake. (May want to expand into surrounding countries after significant mapping is done in the UL08m)

File:Invest - The Noun Project.svg	Human geography
	A brief description of the territory demographics, economic development, land occupation, infrastructure and mapping style

Lucetia is a culturally rich and geographically diverse nation with a population of approximately 12 million people. The demographic composition reflects its deep historical roots, with about 70% of the population descending from Romantian peoples from the former Kingdom of Pretany. The nation is bilingual, with Lucetian Romance used in ceremonial and official contexts and Lucetian English, enriched with Latin loanwords, spoken in daily life. The population is predominantly urban, with 65% residing in cities such as St. Richard’s, Portus Regina, and Nova Caeloria, while 35% live in rural areas characterized by agricultural villages and historic hamlets.

Economically, Lucetia thrives on a mix of traditional and modern industries. Tourism is a cornerstone of the economy, driven by the country's historical landmarks, Romance-inspired architecture, and vibrant cultural festivals. Agriculture remains significant, with Lucetia renowned for its vineyards, olive groves, and artisanal food production. Education and innovation are central to its development, with prestigious universities and research centers located in Nova Caeloria and St. Richard’s. The nation has also invested heavily in green technology, utilizing solar farms and wind power along its scenic coastline. Maritime trade is another critical sector, with major ports in Portus Regina and Maris Civitas handling regional and global commerce. Lucetia’s GDP per capita is moderately high, reflecting a balance between high-value industries and traditional crafts.

Land use in Lucetia showcases a harmonious blend of urban development, agricultural production, and protected natural areas. Urban centers are compact and dense, featuring Roman-style forums, medieval streets, and Victorian neighborhoods. They emphasize walkability and public squares, making cities cultural and economic hubs. The countryside is dotted with terraced vineyards, olive orchards, and small farming villages, set against forested highlands and river valleys. Significant portions of the countryside are preserved as national parks or cultural heritage sites, maintaining biodiversity and the nation's historical identity.

Infrastructure in Lucetia is both modern and historically inspired. A well-developed rail network connects major cities and rural areas, featuring high-speed trains and scenic routes. Roman-style roads have been updated but still follow their historical paths in many regions. Seaports in Portus Regina and smaller coastal docks facilitate trade and tourism, while Aeroportus Magna Lucetia near St. Richard’s serves as the international gateway. Utilities are advanced, with a renewable energy grid that combines solar, wind, and hydropower, and water management systems influenced by ancient Roman aqueducts. Fiber-optic internet ensures connectivity across urban and suburban areas, supporting the country’s knowledge-based economy.

Lucetia’s mapping style reflects its historical and cultural depth. Urban layouts blend Romance and medieval influences, featuring large forums, public squares, and radial street designs. St. Richard’s, the capital, showcases a Roman forum at its core, surrounded by medieval neighborhoods, Gothic cathedrals, and Victorian suburbs. Smaller cities include amphitheaters, basilicas, and compact town centers, while rural areas highlight winding roads, terraced farmland, and central market squares. Maps emphasize historical layers, from ancient ruins to modern expansions, and feature bilingual labeling in Latin for official purposes and English for practical use. Infrastructure such as railways, aqueducts, and trade routes are prominently displayed, underscoring Lucetia’s blend of historical connectivity and modern advancements.

File:Noun Project languages icon 105908 cc.svg	History & culture
	A brief description of the intended culture and language

This is a country that formed after the Breakup of Pretany. This is what became of the former St. Richards Metropolitan area. Many Themes from the former Nortian Tribe will exist across this country.

File:Noun Project drawing icon 2123401.svg	Past mapping
	To support your request provide links to areas of OGF mapping which showcase your mapping skill. Mapping relevant to the requested theme & geography is especially useful.
	The {{coord}}, {{node}}, {{relation}} or {{scalehelper}} templates can optionally be used to link to the OGF map - they result in nicely formatted links. Or you can paste in a URL.

https://opengeofiction.net/search?whereami=1&query=55.1091%2C59.3495#map=11/55.1090/59.3495&layers=B

File:Noun Project Signature icon 619326 cc.svg	Username & date
	Sign and date the application by typing four tildes (~~~~) without spaces or "nowiki" tags.

Bhj867 (talk) 21:19, 12 January 2025 (UTC)

File:Noun project 579150 Conversation.svg	Discussion
	Discussion for clarification & decision

• Before I proceed with commenting the application, I'd require you to provide some visual plans for the territory and what you have describe, please. You can look at past applications for inspiration. Thanks! ⸺ Bixelkoven (talk) (West Uletha Admin) 10:10, 13 January 2025 (UTC)

• Take a look at this link for an idea of how I would like to lay out the country. https://ibb.co/1GgygmP Bhj867 (talk) 02:24, 15 January 2025 (UTC)

• Hi, I'm not admin, but I suggest coming up with a different name because of the definite similarity between Lucetia and Lutecia, the ancient name for Paris (similar to how Pretany resembled Pretani/Pritanī, the ancient name for Britain). --IiEarth (talk) 19:29, 14 January 2025 (UTC)

• I don't see anything wrong with the name. Nor did anyone have an issue with the name Pretany before today. Many countries in OGF have similar but not identical names to historical places. I will let others weigh in, Thank you for your input. Bhj867 (talk) 02:24, 15 January 2025 (UTC)

• Thanks for posting the sketch! There are two things I'd like to discuss about from your application:

1 - The river delta you have drawn looks incredibly large and I am not sure if it's realistic to have it that big. As it is mapped right now, the River Ise has a length of 635 kilometers until it enters the Pretannic Lake (and you seem to have trimmed it even shorter in your sketch). That is a very short distance for the river to create such a large delta. For comparion in sizes, please refer to the rivers Po in Europe and Selenga in Asia (the latter also enters a lake like the Ise), which have much smaller deltas than what you have drawn while being similar/longer in length. Also with the way you have imagined the delta this impacts the neighboring country. It would be nice to see if user Kalh79 is fine with this, so you may contact them regarding that.

One potential solution is to lengthen the river Ise towards the north, which I can technically do, but only if you want to keep the delta somewhat larger. I still believe you should decrease the size of the delta, but I am willing to meet your demands by adapting the river in the neighboring unclaimed territories. Please tell me how do you see this issue and I hope we can reach a compromise.

2 - As seen on this map the region is mostly Romance (not necessarily fully Romance), however there is Germanic in the vicinity (German and Dutch). English and its country of origin (Ingrea) is rather far away from UL08m. How do you explain the presence of English in this territory?

3 - The territory has this tag assigned to it on the Overview Map: "This territory is partly home to an important canal system". Please be acknowledged of this canal system that was imagined to enhance collaboration between mappers in the region. You can see how the canal was imagined on the following link. ⸺ Bixelkoven (talk) (West Uletha Admin) 17:25, 15 January 2025 (UTC)

• I agree with Bixelkoven, I think that the size of the river delta should be reduced and the current course of the river should be respected. Regards and Welcome back Bhj867!!! --Kalh79 (talk) 19:35, 15 January 2025 (UTC)

  • 1. New draft. The river and canal does not change along Kalh79s border. (my apologies as I missed that canal). I shrunk the delta and if you can extend the river a bit deeper into the continent that would be appreciated. https://ibb.co/SQ07t93
    2. If you want I can take UL08P too a expand it myself. Or UL08L and UL08P and move everything further away from Kalhs border. Another option is to expand Kalhs territory to match the current river border and he take the entire canal and I move everything left and take all three (or two) of those territories.
    3. (your 2nd point) This correlates with my current mapping of St. Richard's that exists. If you would like we can remove this application and choose a country closer to English speaking countries. Pretany originally had an English colony in its history before my country was split up and the my Wiki page was deleted. This was the logical direction for me to go in to adhere to my previous mapping data I already created, since a Roman style papal state was no longer an option (per our prior messages). In short what I am trying to do is "squeeze" Old Pretannic capital and Nortian (Roman) tribal lands in a modern context into a small area near or close to the current Prettanic state. Bhj867 (talk) 21:03, 15 January 2025 (UTC)
    4. Thank you Kalh79, glad to be back!

    As for the name issue, well, we have to remember this isn't old OGF anymore where we can get a little lazy with names (Ingerland, Mergany). I recommend trying to be a little more creative with the name and think of alternatives in the meantime (and Lutecia could be reused as a region name instead), but also it depends on admin's discretion with the name. Just adding my thoughts as one who once collaborated with you. The proposal sounds rather interesting, bringing back some of the more creative elements of old Pretany.--Zhenkang (talk) 01:18, 16 January 2025 (UTC)

    "LAZY"? That's a bit harsh. I highly doubt anyone, including yourself or iiearth, would know what the tribal and pre-roman names of Britain or Paris were unless one cracked open an obscure history book, or deep-dived into Wikipedia. If anything I find it historically clever. We can change the name if need be, but I believe we need to leave intellectual snobbery at the door. This is a fun site to get creative, not to argue the (changed spelling mind you) of obscure Oppida names last used in the 2nd century BC. It is not realistic to have 100% unique names. Much of the "Creative elements" you mention were made the exact way this name was created. "This isn't the old OGF anymore" . . .I'm aware . Thank you Bhj867 (talk) 02:27, 16 January 2025 (UTC)

    _______________________

    How do we feel about changing the name to **Occiprania** is a compound name derived from two Latin roots: Occiprania is a compound name derived from two Latin roots:

  1. "Occi-": From occidens, the Latin word meaning "west" or "the setting sun." This part emphasizes the western orientation of the country, anchoring it in the concept of "West Pretannia."
  2. "-prania": A creative adaptation from Pretannia,
  3. Why it works: Historical Weight: The name retains the cultural and geographic connotations of Latin origins while feeling distinct and evolved. Natural Evolution: The "i" in Occi- blends smoothly with the softer -prania, mirroring how languages simplify and combine over time. Distinctiveness: It diverges from existing names like "Occitania" or "Pretannia," ensuring originality. Balanced Tone: The name strikes a balance between being regal and approachable, suitable for both historical and modern contexts.
     Occiprania encapsulates the essence of a western-oriented Pretannic culture while sounding like a name that could naturally develop over time in an alternate history or linguistic tradition. It conveys continuity, heritage, and distinct identity. Bhj867 (talk) 15:49, 16 January 2025 (UTC)

Welcome back, Bhj. Just to reset the conversation for a moment to address the largest matter we as the regional admin see. The matter remains unresolved as to how the Ingerish got into the interior in this way, given the overland distance and other historic powers in the area. It may sound a bit preposterous at first glance, but I would like to offer a more different idea. I see how you are trying to construct the culture and history, and I also remember how old Pretany's history roughly laid out. What about the eastern half of UL04e? That eastern half is larger than what you're presently asking for by just a little bit, and we can redo the coastline and alter that large bay.

Now, I know the climate is a bit different, but here is the rationale: The OGF equivalent of a Roman empire (name of which is still an ongoing discussion that I would like to have resolved soon) could have easily stretched to the UL04e coast at its peak. The open coastline, a potential deep natural harbour or wide estuary, and other nearby cultures to the east that are actually connected in history to the "Roman" world would make this location a great trade nexus in "Roman" antiquity. As that empire collapsed, you'd be left with a grand "Roman" city (possibly even many "Roman" towns) that could form the nexus of this territory. When the Ingerish arrive (perhaps 1400s or early 1500s), they take over by some means—whether that be royal marriage, war, whatever. This is used as a springboard to settle elsewhere in the OGF world (e.g. Khaiwoon, east Uletha, etc.). This location would help bridge the Ingerish-spawned "new world" feel of nearby places with the "old world" themes a short distance away. The capital could have been a major trade hub in history and helped make the Ingerish crown quite wealthy, and it allows you to keep both primary influences that you want in the territory. If this is amenable, then we'll address any minor things outstanding at that point.

Thanks. — Alessa _(talk) 20:19, 16 January 2025 (UTC)

As a follow-up point: I'm happy to relocate St. Richards if that is a potential hangup to a different territory option, if you didn't want to do that yourself. — Alessa _(talk) 20:50, 16 January 2025 (UTC)

Alessa. In terms of historicity this is a genius idea and I am fully onboard. When you say "Eastern Half" of UL04e, please explain. I would be ok with taking the entire UL04e in full as is, I don't think there is a need to split it in half (If that's what you mean). But I would call it:

The Kingdom of Oriprania

Breakdown of the Compound:

1. "Ori-": From Oriens, the Latin term for "east" or "rising." The shortened form, Ori-, reflects linguistic simplification over time, as prefixes often get condensed for ease of use in evolving languages.
2. "-prania": Derived from Pretannia, maintaining a connection to the cultural and geographic heritage of the region. The "-prania" suffix mirrors the evolution seen in historical words Oriens pretannica, tying the two names together linguistically and historically.

I will create a draft map for what this land could look like and get back to you. Also thank you for the offer, I can move St. Richards in JOSM easily.

Here's a rough draft of historical context

Historical Context of Oriprania

Formation and Ancient Heritage

Oriprania, officially known as The Kingdom of Oriprania, traces its origins to the collapse of the Nortian Tribal Confederation and the subsequent spread of Romantian influence during the peak of the Pretanic Empire. The region, with its strategic eastern location near major waterways and fertile deltas, became a vital hub for trade and cultural exchange. The Romantian settlers established enduring towns with forums, aqueducts, and fortified outposts, laying the foundation for Oriprania's urban and architectural identity. These settlements formed the core of what would later evolve into thriving medieval cities, preserving their blend of Romantian and tribal traditions.

The Ingerish Colonization and the "Rising Kingdom"

In the 15th century, Oriprania experienced a seismic shift in governance and culture when Ingerish explorers arrived via maritime routes. Drawn by the region's wealth and strategic importance, the Ingerish Crown forged alliances with local rulers, eventually asserting dominance through a combination of diplomacy and military conquest. This period marked the beginning of Oriprania’s bilingual identity, as Lucetian Romance became interwoven with Ingerish influences in governance, trade, and daily life. Known as the "Rising Kingdom," Oriprania grew into a critical staging ground for Ingerish expansion into neighboring territories, blending its ancient heritage with burgeoning modernity.

Cultural Renaissance and Modern Identity

By the 19th century, Oriprania underwent a cultural renaissance, fueled by its role as a crossroads of ancient traditions and modern innovations. The capital, St. Richard’s, became synonymous with intellectual and artistic pursuits, hosting grand expos and fostering advancements in green energy and maritime engineering. Modern Oriprania prides itself on its dual heritage: the eastern (Oriens) orientation reflected in its name and the enduring influence of the Pretanic legacy. The Kingdom has become a beacon of sustainable development, historical preservation, and cultural unity, blending its diverse influences into a distinct national identity that honors its storied past while looking toward the future.

Bhj867 (talk) 02:20, 17 January 2025 (UTC)

https://ibb.co/QMk3k3v (see rough draft for UL04e) Mind you St. Richards at that latitude will more than likely be smaller than that.Bhj867 (talk) 03:39, 17 January 2025 (UTC)

I'm glad this location will work for you. Let's stick with the eastern half for now (roughly from the river that bisects "tourism coast" on your map northwest of St. Richards to the final 's' in "forested mountains" north of there; the large island you've carved out would not be included in your zone for now). Here is the rationale for this: Based on your previous mapping, I'm willing to put trust in your skill to handle this advanced-flagged territory. At the same time, it is a pivotal transition zone between "old world" and "new world." Your concept has promise, but under normal circumstances I'd ask for a demonstration of how these cultures would synthesise first (usually somewhere else until proven). Until I can see the concept in practice, I want a continued buffer between this concept and actual old-world homelands (Catalan–Occitan continuum borders the current UL04e). So, I'm willing to go out on a bit of a limb and give you the eastern half to see if it works. If it does, we can go through the procedure for expansion west.

Relatedly, I'm seeing that this territory is going to be English-dominant. Okay, but I am trusting that this concept will work in a transition zone. Please expand upon what the underlying pre-Ingerish 'Romance language' would look like and its role in your territory. I would like to hear some specifics about it to really understand instead of vague generalisations.

Next, turning to the history, I'm not sure your generated information really fits in its current iteration. I have no clue what a "Pretannic Empire" or the "Nortians" are in this case. There is no name for the Roman equivalent yet (Romantish is fine as a placeholder for this discussion), is that what you're thinking of? Kalh has reused the name "Pretany" for his territory as a clear homage to your previous mapping. I don't see how that name would reach this far south. Were the Nortians an indigenous pre-Ingerish group in the territory? Clarification on these substrates to the territorial history is needed.

Thanks. — Alessa _(talk) 17:46, 17 January 2025 (UTC)

Hi Alessa, Thanks for taking the time to provide detailed feedback. I really appreciate the effort you’re putting into guiding this process, but I’m feeling a little confused about what’s being asked. In your first comment, it seemed like the plan for UL08m was pretty clear, you mentioned the Ingerish arriving in the 1400s or 1500s, taking over through something like royal marriage or war, and then using the area as a springboard for settling other parts of the OGF world. You also mentioned the capital acting as a major trade hub that made the Ingerish Crown wealthy, blending old-world and new-world influences. That sounded like a great starting point, and I was ready to build on that, tying in old nortian history (The Nortian tribe was the original starting point of Romantish in the original Pretanic History, and a building block of many elements of St. Richards which is already mapped, which is why I brought it up). Now, in your follow-up, it feels like the expectations have shifted. You’re asking for more specifics about things like the pre-Ingerish cultures, how the Romance language developed, and the details of how all these elements fit together. I’m happy to dig deeper, but I just want to be sure I’m focusing on what’s most important. Could you clarify whether the approach you mentioned earlier, focused on the Ingerish colonization, the trade hub, and the blending of influences, is still what you’re looking for? Or are these new specifics a must for UL08m? I really want to make this work but just need a bit more clarity on how to move forward. Thanks again, Bhj867 (talk) 22:40, 17 January 2025 (UTC)

I'm happy to provide more clarification, and I apologise if this wasn't clear. I'll start at the beginning. What I put forward in the proposal with Ingerish colonization and trade hub was the superstructure of an idea in broad terms to find a parallel to your working model. Since you have found it agreeable, what I'm interested is getting more of the on-the-ground details of how you would be able to accommodate the regional blending. A generic "territory blending" or mentions of an otherwise undefined 'Nortian' presence is not specific enough. I'm viewing the Ingerish-dominance with 'Roman' legacy cities as a settled macro vision. My line of thinking at this point is how the details will help blend west and east and fine-tuning that just a bit. Your write-ups above offer little glimpses of things that are unexplained or unrealised, and I'm trying to get to the bottom of those to help guide the transitional element of this territory.

Here is an example. You just noted that "the Nortian tribe was the original starting point of Romantish in the original Pretanic History, and a building block of many elements of St. Richards which is already mapped." Okay, great. But, what is Nortian culture and who were they? I'd like to know how this substrata fits with the region around it. That's unclear, since there is nothing in the OGF canon about this group. So, it's not a shift in expectations, it is a shift from looking at the macro to more of the details. Part of the issue might be that you're making references to things (like Nortians) that have a specific meaning to you but are not clear to us.

Similarly, you previously mentioned that cities would be descendant from "established enduring towns with forums, aqueducts, and fortified outposts" as the "foundation for Oriprania's urban and architectural identity." That makes sense and aligns with the macro concept of legacy 'Roman' settlements as key places in your territory. Naturally, you make allusion to the sub-Roman culture by saying that these cities "preserv[e] their blend of Romantian and tribal traditions." So, I'm trying to figure out what those "tribal traditions" are (I assume undefined 'Nortian' based on your previous comment). Once again, how are these traditions relevant to the present day beyond the extant mapping of St. Richards? What about other cities? How might these legacy traditions help show connection with cultures to the west, if at all? I trust this unpacks where I'm going with this. I'm not looking for all answers here but rather enough to get a glimpse of how the territory would look fit on the edges of the Romance-area continuum (not just linguistically), while also in the more post-colonial area to the east.

Regarding language, if the Ingerish arrive only in the 15th century or so, it would likely take time to integrate and create something new. Thus, you rightly note "this period marked the beginning of Oriprania’s bilingual identity, as Lucetian Romance became interwoven with Ingerish influences in governance, trade, and daily life." Here is where clarification is needed, since it was left a bit open-ended. The statement as worded implies a continuing bilingual state. I'm wondering if that is in fact the case. If the territory has an enduring 'Lucetian ('Nortian?') Romance,' even as a minority language, that'd be an incredibly efficient way to connect westward. But, this is not clear. What is this Lucetian Romance, and what presence does it still have on the Ingerish used on the map in your territory? For example, it is unlikely that the Ingerish accession you describe of only 500 years or so would completely eradicate or Ingericise all surnames, placenames, traditional identifiers, etc. Next, are you looking to have a bilingual instance or even a notable historic minority language of 'Lucetian Romance?' If so, then my wonder is how that would manifest on the map? Again, my line of thinking is showing the transitional continuum between the two regions to some degree, so I'm trying to get a bit into the weeds of how an Ingerish-dominant country also looks westward as much as it does eastward. Another way to word it would be, 'what makes this country not Ingrea with Roman cities?' What makes the culture that does appear on the map distinct to this territory while fitting in with those around it?

To also be clear, I'm not looking for a 50–50 blend. I recognise that this is both illogical and difficult. So, in a nutshell, my view is that the macro vision is settled: (1) the placement of cities and major features is fine based on the map for the eastern half of the territory, split out as defined above; (2) the Roman legacy settlements survived and were ultimately taken over by the Ingerish crown in the 15th century or thereafter; (3) the territory is probably dominantly Ingerish in language with local influences. That means I'm just trying to pin down a bit more about the details stemming from that third point, like what those local influences are, how they fit relationally to the Romance region next door (and beyond), etc. Part of doing that is figuring out what these little nuggets of interesting information you provided really mean when unpacked.

As an aside, I personally find the Lucetian name perfectly reasonable and even like it over Nortian, if you were to use it for the name of an ethnic group, pre-Ingerish culture, language, or whatnot.

Please let me know if this doesn't make sense. Thanks! — Alessa _(talk) 00:54, 18 January 2025 (UTC)

I can see how much care you’ve put into this, and it’s greatly appreciated. That said, I want to be upfront about the challenge of pulling all these elements together on my own. Balancing the histories, cultures, and dynamics of West Uletha into a cohesive narrative is no small task. The complexity of weaving together pre-Ingerish cultures, colonial influences, linguistic evolution, and regional ties is significant. I’m more than happy to give it my best effort, but I think some collaboration or a phased approach could help make this process more manageable and effective. I would suggest other country owners throw in their input on this, up to the point that based on your information here UL04e might better be served as a completely collaborative country. I’ve summarized the questions below and included some creative ideas for each. These are just initial thoughts to get us moving in the right direction. I think we closely need to consider what CAN and what CANNOT or is difficult to map. I think it’s critical to focus on what is practical, ensuring the narrative enhances the map rather than becoming overly ambitious in ways that cannot be visually represented.

Nortian Culture and Legacy

The Nortians were an indigenous agrarian society predating Roman influence, thriving in fertile lands near St. Richard’s. They formed a hierarchical community with strong communal bonds, which enabled them to adopt Roman administrative practices when the Romantish Empire expanded into the region. Nortian culture remained intact to some degree, particularly in local governance and agricultural methods, even as they became a Roman client state. Mapping Possibilities: Administrative or cultural influences can be reflected in the naming of towns or administrative divisions that bear Nortian or hybridized names. Seasonal festivals tied to Nortian heritage cannot be directly mapped, but their importance could be referenced in the naming of public spaces, historic monuments, or cultural centers. Challenges: Representing the Nortians’ cultural legacy beyond linguistic elements or geographic markers is difficult on the map. For example, while their historical role in shaping governance can be alluded to, visualizing their traditions requires storytelling in descriptions or documentation. Lucetian Romance and Linguistic Development Lucetian Romance evolved as a hybrid language, blending Latin introduced by the Romantish Empire with Nortian phonetics and grammar. Its distinctiveness grew due to geographic isolation and cultural blending, even as Ingerish dominance in the 15th century began to shape urban governance and trade. By the 17th century, Lucetian Romance remained prominent in rural areas and official ceremonies, leaving a linguistic legacy visible today in placenames such as Portus Regina and Maris Civitas and surnames like Caelorian. Mapping Possibilities: Placenames, street names, and other geographical labels can showcase Lucetian Romance, especially in rural or historic areas. Surnames of local leaders, historical figures, or institutions could also reflect Lucetian linguistic roots. Challenges: While linguistic influences can be mapped in names, representing their evolution or significance over time relies on supplemental storytelling or wiki documentation. Cultural Distinctiveness The region’s unique identity stems from its fusion of Nortian, Roman, and Ingerish influences. Nortian governance structures evolved into Roman-style magistrates, later adapting to Ingerish parliamentary systems. This historical layering is a testament to its complex cultural trajectory. Cuisine also embodies this blend, with Mediterranean-inspired dishes incorporating local ingredients and colonial Ingerish staples like tea and savory pies. Annual festivals combine Lucetian folk traditions with modern Ingerish parades. Mapping Possibilities: Offices of cultural non-profits or organizations dedicated to preserving Lucetian heritage can reflect this blend in urban layouts. Public squares, festivals, or landmarks can be named after key historical figures or events tied to this cultural synthesis. Challenges: Cuisine, festivals, and intangible cultural aspects are difficult to map directly but can be referenced through descriptions or linked institutions. These elements are better suited for wiki articles or external cultural context rather than the map itself. Integration with the Regional Context Historically, the region served as a trade hub connecting the Romance west and the Ingerish east. During the Romantish period, it facilitated the export of textiles and agricultural products. After Ingerish colonization, St. Richard’s became a key maritime center for trade, linking eastern colonies with neighboring Romance-speaking regions. This transitional role is further reinforced by bilingualism and the modernization of infrastructure, such as Roman roads repurposed under Ingerish rule. Mapping Possibilities: Trade routes, ports, and transportation networks can reflect this dual heritage, with older Roman roads marked alongside modern Ingerish additions. Infrastructure like canals, bridges, and railways can be named to highlight the region’s role as a connector between east and west. Challenges: Representing the historical economic role of the region requires collaboration with neighboring mappers to ensure consistency with their histories. The narrative impact of trade routes or infrastructure needs agreement from other contributors. Potential New Names for this acrea we can name around the theme of Central Lucetia Mudecia – From medius (middle) and Lucetia, meaning "Middle Lucetia." Lucentra – A blend of Lucetia and centrum (center), suggesting "Heart of Lucetia." Centucia – Derived from centrum (center) and Lucetia, emphasizing its central location. Lucena – A concise and elegant name, adapted from Lucetia with a modern twist. Lunortia - Lucentia and Nortia combined Norcentia - same
furthermore, we can get even more granular on individual things that can be mapped and in what languages and cultures, but I don't think that is conducive to a fun or inviting experience on OGF for myself or anyone else. Micromanaging users mapping on that level is not necessary. What I've stated above is as granular as I will comfortably get until other members with Romantian and Ingerish influence joining in on this conversation and adding their histories and perspectives. Thanks Bhj867 (talk) 03:49, 18 January 2025 (UTC)

Unfortunately, I fear my attempts to be forthright and transparent with my intentions has been misconstrued. This list goes far deeper than I was even asking and gets into things that you correctly note are not visible on the map. I know you are using a generator to help come up with ideas (which is fine, by the way), but the response here goes well beyond what I was actually asking. I'll go back and try to reassess how it might have gone awry on my part. Now, with this list there's some good things in here that we can work with that is easily viable on the map and provides answers to my questions. Let's dive into those. Anything you choose to implement beyond these points I bring up below are up to you. Perhaps this information will be useful for a wiki article down the road.

• My first question was clarification about the Nortians, since they were continuously brought up. The Nortians are pre-Roman and agrarian. Great, that's an easy data point and is a sufficient to show their limited impact on the map. Makes sense and easy. This is different than inferred above, but I can live with it. Please note that your statement about St. Richards having impacts of Nortian society does contrast this, but I'm not going to hang on the point and will consider it subsumed into the second point.
• My second set of questions was about how that eleven or so centuries between 'Roman' and Ingerish rule would impact the map visibly. Cities rise and fall—they also evolve. The idea of having certain urban design traits like common public squares, expected landmarks, and pre-Ingerish toponymy that are post-Roman are all appropriate. Generalised statements like that are perfectly fine, but there should be something that makes this territory (to once again reiterate it) distinct and not not a copy of just the UK with Roman cities. How you deploy this is up to you.
• Regarding language, my principal question was if the country was bilingual, since the text of your response implied it. I see clearly that it is not. All fair on that point. Having language input, however, is still important. The most recent response above suggests the use of toponyms and surnames as a good start. I would simply caution that it should have enough visibility to be a notable feature. Suggestion: If you wanted to take a further step, making up even a half dozen words for geographic features or important cultural inputs and using them instead of English can also go a long way to showing the fusion of cultures. For example, maybe the word 'forest' never caught on from Ingerish and the Lucetian word stuck around. Names that would otherwise be "XXXXX Forest" would all contain that word ("XXXXX YYYYY"). You don't have to do that specifically, but that is an idea to, once again, show a minor degree of culture fusion. I just want to know that you're neither just mashing English and non-evolved Latin together haphazardly while also not just relying on a straight-up English without any pre-Ingerish cultural inputs. Use of Vulgar Latin words for toponyms or geographic features would help too, as another suggestion.

Before wrapping this up, I do feel it prudent to address your first and final assertions to clear the air… it pains me to think you perceived my questions as an attempt to micromanage the minutiae of the mapping or be uninviting. Questions about cultural fit are within my purview and commonly discussed in applications for clarity and certainty. I never asked you to figure out how to balance all of West Uletha on your own; I did try to be transparent about my considerations of the extraterritorial burden I take on for you as regional admin. Maybe that was my fault for muddying the waters. Anyway, my questions were stated to be about what can appear on the map and to clarify what you stated in this application. All that said, all is well now. I'm just a bit sad that this went into a frustrating place. At this point, I pretty much have what I need answered and am mostly satisfied.

Please let me know two things before we finalise this (I will use that time to confirm with my co-admin for the continent and partition the territory). First, I would like to know if you plan to move St. Richards yourself or if you need help moving it. Second, that you will make some of the Lucetian influences listed above into the mapping as notable features (again, beyond that is up to you).

Cheers, — Alessa _(talk) 05:35, 18 January 2025 (UTC)

Hi Alessa, Thank you for your patience and for taking the time to clarify everything. I see now where I might have overcomplicated things, and I appreciate your feedback on what’s actually needed for the map. I apologies if my comments above came off as a charge of ill intent. That was not my motivation for them. I’ll focus on integrating Lucetian influences into visible features like toponyms and geographic names, using some of the suggestions you’ve provided, while keeping the balance realistic and cohesive. For the Nortians, I’ll keep their role minimal but meaningful. I’ll also make sure the urban evolution reflects the unique character of the territory, distinct from just being "the UK with Roman cities," with features like historical squares and notable landmarks tied to its history. To answer your questions:

1. I’ll move St. Richard’s myself, but I’ll reach out if I need help.
2. I’ll include Lucetian influences in ways that are clear and notable on the map. Thank you again for your guidance and for clearing up any misunderstandings. I really appreciate it. Also I use AI to assist me in this in an attempt to trike the right tone. The outcome sometimes falls short and for that I apologize. Best regards,

Bhj867 (talk) 15:57, 18 January 2025 (UTC)

All is well, Bhj. I think we were, in part, talking past each other with the help of the LLM. As of now, I consider this resolved with the aforementioned bits in mind. UL05m has been carved out for you. Welcome back, the new territory (UL05m)^∈⊾ is yours. As a note, the western half will remain UL04e in designation. Let me know if you have any further questions. Happy mapping. — Alessa _(talk) 23:01, 18 January 2025 (UTC)

	Territory application approved
	Approved with agreed upon relocation and tweak of theme to include an underlying "Lucetian Romance" substrata to the English mapping. — Alessa (talk) 23:01, 18 January 2025 (UTC)