Index talk:Aviation: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
mNo edit summary |
||
| Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
|use xpath | |use xpath | ||
}} | }} | ||
{| class="wikitable sortable" | {| class="wikitable sortable mw-collapsible mw-collapsed" | ||
! width=500px; | Name | ! width=500px; | Name | ||
! width=100px; | IATA | ! width=100px; | IATA | ||
| Line 31: | Line 31: | ||
{{#clear_external_data:}} | {{#clear_external_data:}} | ||
:This list doesn’t include airports that don’t have the 4-character code, which is no longer necessary. Additionally, I think there’s value in having a more curated list to filter out non-canon areas and the plethora of airports in blue territories that shouldn’t be considered part of the global aviation network. -[[User:TheMayor|TheMayor]] ([[User talk:TheMayor|talk]]) 01:44, 29 January 2023 (UTC) | :This list doesn’t include airports that don’t have the 4-character code, which is no longer necessary. Additionally, I think there’s value in having a more curated list to filter out non-canon areas and the plethora of airports in blue territories that shouldn’t be considered part of the global aviation network. -[[User:TheMayor|TheMayor]] ([[User talk:TheMayor|talk]]) 01:44, 29 January 2023 (UTC) | ||
::I agree. Overpass can be very powerful, but as a blanket for things like this, it creates a lot of noise of things either non-canon or of dubious canonicity. We already push the limits a bit more with the territorial index pages, but those require nonstandard, OGF-specific tags to appear. — [[User:Alessa|Alessa]] <sub>([[User talk:Alessa|talk]])</sub> 04:08, 30 January 2023 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 04:08, 30 January 2023
Unfortunately, removing the ANACA codes makes it very difficult to find direct neighbors, which should be responsible for 85 % of the flights. Here are some overpass links to check the intl. references of airports
- airports with ICAO code
- airports with IATA code
- airports without IATA/ICAO code
- runways with missing reference --Mstr (talk) (talk) 01:25, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
- Consolidating references to only use the 3-letter code was decided upon about a year ago in this forum thread. –TheMayor (talk) 02:26, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
- Thank you for your answer.--Mstr (talk) (talk) 15:15, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
Here is a list of all airports with their airport codes--Mstr (talk) (talk) 00:13, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
Error while fetching data from URL https://overpass.ogf.rent-a-planet.com/api/interpreter?data=(node%5B%22name%22%5D%5B%22iata%22%5D%5B%22icao%22%5D;way%5B%22name%22%5D%5B%22iata%22%5D%5B%22icao%22%5D;relation%5B%22name%22%5D%5B%22iata%22%5D%5B%22icao%22%5D%3B)%3Bout%3B: $2.
Error fetching URL: Could not resolve host: overpass.ogf.rent-a-planet.com
There was a problem during the HTTP request: 0 Error
Could not get URL https://overpass.ogf.rent-a-planet.com/api/interpreter?data=(node%5B%22name%22%5D%5B%22iata%22%5D%5B%22icao%22%5D;way%5B%22name%22%5D%5B%22iata%22%5D%5B%22icao%22%5D;relation%5B%22name%22%5D%5B%22iata%22%5D%5B%22icao%22%5D%3B)%3Bout%3B after 3 tries.
| Name | IATA | ICAO |
|---|
- This list doesn’t include airports that don’t have the 4-character code, which is no longer necessary. Additionally, I think there’s value in having a more curated list to filter out non-canon areas and the plethora of airports in blue territories that shouldn’t be considered part of the global aviation network. -TheMayor (talk) 01:44, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
- I agree. Overpass can be very powerful, but as a blanket for things like this, it creates a lot of noise of things either non-canon or of dubious canonicity. We already push the limits a bit more with the territorial index pages, but those require nonstandard, OGF-specific tags to appear. — Alessa (talk) 04:08, 30 January 2023 (UTC)