Jump to content

Forum:Territory application/AR120-15 - Passamaqueets (reapplication): Difference between revisions

From OpenGeofiction
No edit summary
feedback
Line 47: Line 47:


* Please clarify - is this in exchange for UL11i, or a second territory request? /[[User:Wangi|wangi]] ([[User talk:Wangi|talk]]) 10:54, 6 October 2024 (UTC)
* Please clarify - is this in exchange for UL11i, or a second territory request? /[[User:Wangi|wangi]] ([[User talk:Wangi|talk]]) 10:54, 6 October 2024 (UTC)
A second territory, last time I checked with Bixelkoven I had enough mapping to do so. [[User:What3089|What3089]] ([[User talk:What3089|talk]]) 14:08, 6 October 2024 (UTC)<!-- replace this with {{territory application approved|summary of decision and signature|optionally useful information for the user}} or {{territory application closed|summary of decision and signature|optionally useful information for the user}} on closing -->
:*A second territory, last time I checked with Bixelkoven I had enough mapping to do so. [[User:What3089|What3089]]
 
*Hi! Where it comes to how past infractions might influence this application, I'll leave that to proper admin. But I do have a few notes of my own:
 
:1. Because the Cerulean Isles act as barrier islands, there likely wouldn't be additional barrier islands off the coast of Robertsburgh. Other alterations to the coastline there are welcome.
 
:2. I've noticed that your highways and railways in Passamaqueets had a large amount of nodes where it isn't necessary, like on a straight segment (which I assume is due to the use of spline tool?). I personally consider this to be bad form. Whatever method you're using, I would recommend using shift+Y to remove unnecessary nodes.
 
:3. What do you plan on doing with the Burton remnants?
 
:--[[User:Fluffr Nuttr|Fluffr Nuttr]] ([[User talk:Fluffr Nuttr|talk]]) 23:35, 12 October 2024 (UTC)
([[User talk:What3089|talk]]) 14:08, 6 October 2024 (UTC)<!-- replace this with {{territory application approved|summary of decision and signature|optionally useful information for the user}} or {{territory application closed|summary of decision and signature|optionally useful information for the user}} on closing -->


{{territory application in progress}}
{{territory application in progress}}

Revision as of 23:35, 12 October 2024

ForumsTerritory application → Territory application/AR120-15 - Passamaqueets (reapplication)
Territory ID and proposed name
The Territory ID (from OpenGeofiction:Territories, e.g. AR123a) and proposed name of the country


AR120-15 Passamaqueets (PA) (Second territory)

Physical geography
An overview of climate, topography and landscape of the country. With the exception of Beginner territories, you should always create a sketch map to illustrate & explain your plans. You can add a link to this (hosted on imgBB, Postimages or similar, but not imgur.com)


Topography

General plan of the topography

Climate

Koppen climate map of PA

Human geography
A brief description of the territory demographics, economic development, land occupation, infrastructure and mapping style


Infrastructure and Settlements

General plan of PA (with the highways)

Territory demographics

The state would have 2 million people, with a big majority living within the Fallsbury metro and the rest on the smaller towns and rural areas, I looked at Rhode Island's land occupation of the state comparing it with the population and it seems like a 2 Million population could fit into Passamaqueets with the urban area being larger in proportion to the state.

Economy

Instead of the tipical college based New England economy, most of Passamaqueets' economy would come from large scale machinery manufacturing (Ex: Cars, Trucks...), and chemical industries. Comparing to the real world, it would be simillar to Ohio, but in a much smaller scale.

Land Occupation + mapping style

While having a larger percentage of the state being urban, there would be still more farmland than Rhode Island with less forest coverage on the coastal flats and more cranberry farms. The mapping style would be a bit of a mix of Massachusetts and Long Island and an unique farmland style.

File:Noun Project languages icon 105908 cc.svgHistory & culture
A brief description of the intended culture and language


History

This state could possibly have a function in the FSA's independence movement, like how Massachusetts had the first events of the American revolution. English would be obviously used, the state could have gotten a bit more immigrants from Plevia and Valonne, but I think that is a bit irrelevant. I believe the name Passamaqueets comes from a native tribe, but I am not sure.

Past mapping
To support your request provide links to areas of OGF mapping which showcase your mapping skill. Mapping relevant to the requested theme & geography is especially useful.
The {{coord}}, {{node}}, {{relation}} or {{scalehelper}} templates can optionally be used to link to the OGF map - they result in nicely formatted links. Or you can paste in a URL.


Sonnenburg

Application mapping

Username & date
Sign and date the application by typing four tildes (~~~~) without spaces or "nowiki" tags.


What3089 (talk) 00:15, 6 October 2024 (UTC)


I would agree to the terms said before, with no applications being made in an year What3089 (talk) 00:15, 6 October 2024 (UTC)

  • Please clarify - is this in exchange for UL11i, or a second territory request? /wangi (talk) 10:54, 6 October 2024 (UTC)
  • A second territory, last time I checked with Bixelkoven I had enough mapping to do so. What3089
  • Hi! Where it comes to how past infractions might influence this application, I'll leave that to proper admin. But I do have a few notes of my own:
1. Because the Cerulean Isles act as barrier islands, there likely wouldn't be additional barrier islands off the coast of Robertsburgh. Other alterations to the coastline there are welcome.
2. I've noticed that your highways and railways in Passamaqueets had a large amount of nodes where it isn't necessary, like on a straight segment (which I assume is due to the use of spline tool?). I personally consider this to be bad form. Whatever method you're using, I would recommend using shift+Y to remove unnecessary nodes.
3. What do you plan on doing with the Burton remnants?
--Fluffr Nuttr (talk) 23:35, 12 October 2024 (UTC)

(talk) 14:08, 6 October 2024 (UTC)