Forum:Global and regional issues/Worldwide Calling Codes' Scheme: Difference between revisions

From OpenGeofiction
mNo edit summary
No edit summary
Line 16: Line 16:


::I also think we should keep the old system. It's simple and intuitive so it's possible to work. Also there is no reason to change. --[[User:Rustem Pasha|Rustem Pasha]] ([[User talk:Rustem Pasha|talk]]) 09:42, 4 December 2023 (UTC)
::I also think we should keep the old system. It's simple and intuitive so it's possible to work. Also there is no reason to change. --[[User:Rustem Pasha|Rustem Pasha]] ([[User talk:Rustem Pasha|talk]]) 09:42, 4 December 2023 (UTC)
:::I see nothing wrong with the original calling code setup. Might as well keep the old system but keep the tables and lists defaulting to numerical order to more obviously show what numbers are taken. --[[User:Ernestpkirby|Ernestpkirby]] ([[User talk:Ernestpkirby|talk]]) 19:45, 6 December 2023 (UTC)


This is the previous consensus:
This is the previous consensus:

Revision as of 19:45, 6 December 2023

ForumsGlobal and regional issues → Global and regional issues/Worldwide Calling Codes' Scheme


This is how phone codes looked like before Wiki 1.0 shutdown. I am certain about +1..+5, +6..+9 may've been misaligned.

This is my sketch of how I remember the calling codes' assignment listed on Wiki 1.0.

Some countries on OGF Data spreadsheet kept the old code while some other countries came up with the new one.

I do understand that keeping this thing standard for everyone will end up in a failure, but hey, it worked pretty well before Wiki 1.0 ceasing, so at least we can try.

OP: Sudo91 (talk) 21:05, 3 December 2023 (UTC)

I prefer this proposal over others. Many countries in West Uletha already have +2x(x) as their phone codes. -- Mie (talk) 08:19, 4 December 2023 (UTC)
I also think we should keep the old system. It's simple and intuitive so it's possible to work. Also there is no reason to change. --Rustem Pasha (talk) 09:42, 4 December 2023 (UTC)
I see nothing wrong with the original calling code setup. Might as well keep the old system but keep the tables and lists defaulting to numerical order to more obviously show what numbers are taken. --Ernestpkirby (talk) 19:45, 6 December 2023 (UTC)

This is the previous consensus:

Zone Area
0 unassigned
1 unassigned
2 West Uletha
3 East Uletha
4 Tarephia
5 Antarephia
6 Archanta
7 Pelanesia & Orano
8 Ereva
9 Kartumia

/wangi (talk) 14:02, 4 December 2023 (UTC)

We got rid of the telephone code system because various mappers in the community kept trying to impose their vision of a telephone code system upon the world instead of letting the community choose the codes organically, which created conflict. If we can do better this time, I think we'll be more successful at maintaining this list. The one condition I think we need to keep is the three-digit requirement so that there are enough codes to allocate around the world. Otherwise, we could do two-digit with shared codes between countries. Chazeltine (talk) 14:30, 4 December 2023 (UTC)

Why not both? Everyone can choose whether to align their territory's code with this standard (which I think is what most follow already anyway, right?), and I would also second that we promote it a little more. And if a few mappers don't want to, that will create the very same mess that we observe with lots of international agreements in the real world. We could pose the slight restriction that such contries are only allowed three-digit codes or similar. I am actually quite surprised how orderly the real-world world map of telephone codes is; a few countries deviating and having weird three-digit, non-conforming codes would seem much more belivable to me :) Leowezy (talk) 15:52, 4 December 2023 (UTC)
It's a technical standard, which needs to be accurate in the real-world for international dialling to work, rather than a showboat political standard. If a country does it wrong, then nobody from a third country can phone them. But in OGF, it's really just about avoiding dupes. wikipedia:International direct dialing /wangi (talk) 16:47, 4 December 2023 (UTC)
Speaking of 3-digit and 2-digit codes, Wiki 1.0 page said that only 3-digit and 4-digit codes may be reserved and people followed that rule. FSA had a 2-digit code (was it +63?) and Suria had a 2-digit code +29 (back then it had 10 federal republic, assuming each republic would get a 3-digit code, like +292 for Lido Republic). I can't recall people reserving 2-digit codes, maybe apart from single discrepancies. // Sudo91 (talk) 17:59, 4 December 2023 (UTC)
The FSA's code according to the old wiki was +611. --TheMayor (talk) 18:11, 4 December 2023 (UTC)
Was there any good reason to discuss/change the "old" code system? I would also prefer to keep the old one with the digits given in the table above. For each zone, there should be groups of countries with the same second digit. And in each group, a few third digits should be left to allow additional countries in the future (if there is the need).--Mstr (talk) (talk) 18:17, 6 December 2023 (UTC)