Forum:Territory application/AR120-15 - Passamaqueets (reapplication): Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
AR120-15 to what3089 |
||
| Line 63: | Line 63: | ||
Hello, I will do some more research on how coastlines work with sediments, but I am fine with removing the barrier islands. As for the Nodes, at the time I had made those ways I didn't really know how to simplify the splinex plugin, but I have learned how to do that now with the settings, thanks for the shortcut. As for the third point, Minimapper would like to adopt the remnants, I don't really think I could fit those anywhere considering Fallsbury would be in a bay in a position very different from Boston and the simillar Burton Bay | Hello, I will do some more research on how coastlines work with sediments, but I am fine with removing the barrier islands. As for the Nodes, at the time I had made those ways I didn't really know how to simplify the splinex plugin, but I have learned how to do that now with the settings, thanks for the shortcut. As for the third point, Minimapper would like to adopt the remnants, I don't really think I could fit those anywhere considering Fallsbury would be in a bay in a position very different from Boston and the simillar Burton Bay | ||
[[User:What3089|What3089]] ([[User talk:What3089|talk]]) 02:49, 13 October 2024 (UTC). | [[User:What3089|What3089]] ([[User talk:What3089|talk]]) 02:49, 13 October 2024 (UTC). | ||
{{territory application | {{territory application approved|Approved /[[User:Wangi|wangi]] ([[User talk:Wangi|talk]]) 21:25, 18 October 2024 (UTC)}} | ||
Latest revision as of 21:25, 18 October 2024
| File:Noun Project Signature icon 619326 cc.svg | Territory ID and proposed name |
|---|---|
| The Territory ID (from OpenGeofiction:Territories, e.g. AR123a) and proposed name of the country |
AR120-15 Passamaqueets (PA) (Second territory)
| File:Noun Project Map icon 1463108.svg | Physical geography |
|---|---|
| An overview of climate, topography and landscape of the country. With the exception of Beginner territories, you should always create a sketch map to illustrate & explain your plans. You can add a link to this (hosted on imgBB, Postimages or similar, but not imgur.com) |
Topography
General plan of the topography
Climate
| File:Invest - The Noun Project.svg | Human geography |
|---|---|
| A brief description of the territory demographics, economic development, land occupation, infrastructure and mapping style |
Infrastructure and Settlements
General plan of PA (with the highways)
Territory demographics
The state would have 2 million people, with a big majority living within the Fallsbury metro and the rest on the smaller towns and rural areas, I looked at Rhode Island's land occupation of the state comparing it with the population and it seems like a 2 Million population could fit into Passamaqueets with the urban area being larger in proportion to the state.
Economy
Instead of the tipical college based New England economy, most of Passamaqueets' economy would come from large scale machinery manufacturing (Ex: Cars, Trucks...), and chemical industries. Comparing to the real world, it would be simillar to Ohio, but in a much smaller scale.
Land Occupation + mapping style
While having a larger percentage of the state being urban, there would be still more farmland than Rhode Island with less forest coverage on the coastal flats and more cranberry farms. The mapping style would be a bit of a mix of Massachusetts and Long Island and an unique farmland style.
| File:Noun Project languages icon 105908 cc.svg | History & culture |
|---|---|
| A brief description of the intended culture and language |
History
This state could possibly have a function in the FSA's independence movement, like how Massachusetts had the first events of the American revolution. English would be obviously used, the state could have gotten a bit more immigrants from Plevia and Valonne, but I think that is a bit irrelevant. I believe the name Passamaqueets comes from a native tribe, but I am not sure.
| File:Noun Project drawing icon 2123401.svg | Past mapping |
|---|---|
| To support your request provide links to areas of OGF mapping which showcase your mapping skill. Mapping relevant to the requested theme & geography is especially useful. | |
| The {{coord}}, {{node}}, {{relation}} or {{scalehelper}} templates can optionally be used to link to the OGF map - they result in nicely formatted links. Or you can paste in a URL. |
| File:Noun Project Signature icon 619326 cc.svg | Username & date |
|---|---|
| Sign and date the application by typing four tildes (~~~~) without spaces or "nowiki" tags. |
What3089 (talk) 00:15, 6 October 2024 (UTC)
| File:Noun project 579150 Conversation.svg | Discussion |
|---|---|
| Discussion for clarification & decision |
I would agree to the terms said before, with no applications being made in an year What3089 (talk) 00:15, 6 October 2024 (UTC)
- Please clarify - is this in exchange for UL11i, or a second territory request? /wangi (talk) 10:54, 6 October 2024 (UTC)
- A second territory, last time I checked with Bixelkoven I had enough mapping to do so. What3089
- Hi! Where it comes to how past infractions might influence this application, I'll leave that to proper admin. But I do have a few notes of my own:
- 1. Because the Cerulean Isles act as barrier islands, there likely wouldn't be additional barrier islands off the coast of Robertsburgh. Other alterations to the coastline there are welcome.
- 2. I've noticed that your highways and railways in Passamaqueets had a large amount of nodes where it isn't necessary, like on a straight segment (which I assume is due to the use of spline tool?). I personally consider this to be bad form. Whatever method you're using, I would recommend using shift+Y to remove unnecessary nodes.
- 3. What do you plan on doing with the Burton remnants?
- --Fluffr Nuttr (talk) 23:35, 12 October 2024 (UTC)
(talk) 14:08, 6 October 2024 (UTC)
Hello, I will do some more research on how coastlines work with sediments, but I am fine with removing the barrier islands. As for the Nodes, at the time I had made those ways I didn't really know how to simplify the splinex plugin, but I have learned how to do that now with the settings, thanks for the shortcut. As for the third point, Minimapper would like to adopt the remnants, I don't really think I could fit those anywhere considering Fallsbury would be in a bay in a position very different from Boston and the simillar Burton Bay
What3089 (talk) 02:49, 13 October 2024 (UTC).
| File:Feather-core-check-square.svg | Territory application approved |
|---|---|
| Approved /wangi (talk) 21:25, 18 October 2024 (UTC) | |
| As you develop your territory, be sure to keep it realistic. Here are some resources you may find useful for starting out: Help:Portal, Help:Making realistic countries, Help:Making realistic cities and OpenGeofiction:Site policies |