Forum:Territory application/AR060-12 Peralia

From OpenGeofiction
Jump to navigation Jump to search
ForumsTerritory application → Territory application/AR060-12 Peralia


Please fill in the information below to make a territory request.
Noun Project Signature icon 619326 cc.svgTerritory ID and proposed name
The Territory ID (from OpenGeofiction:Territories, e.g. AR123a) and proposed name of the country


AR060-12 Peralia (to be done alongside AR060-11 and 13 as one project)

Noun Project Map icon 1463108.svgPhysical geography
An overview of climate, topography and landscape of the country. It is advised to also create a sketch, you can add a link to this (hosted on imgur or similar)


We intend the western parts of AR060-12 to be a mostly flat area, with the occasional gentle hiills and rivers that flow from the east. Along its border with FSA, there will be a large mountain range, where there is an abundance of minerals like coal and iron. The general climate of AR060-12 will be temperate, with biomes such as temperate forests and grasslands found throughout the territory

Invest - The Noun Project.svgHuman geography
A brief description of the territory demographics, economic development, land occupation, infrastructure and mapping style


The economy of this part of Peralia is export-orientated and quite diversified, but with the mining sector being the largest due to the abundance of minerals in the eastern mountain range. Other major industries will be manufacturing and agricultural, which dominates the interior of Peralia due to its generally flat land and fertile soil. Land occupation will include a major city (pop. 2.5-3.5m) located on the coast in the southwest and another major city located on the coast in the north, next to the border with the FSA. A planned city is to be located in the interior as shown by the map, which was built to serve as the provincial capital of Peralia and to promote inland development. It will have a population of around 600k-700k. Smaller towns and communities will be spread throughout the interior and along the coastline. The mapping style with be based off Australia and New Zealand.

Noun Project languages icon 105908 cc.svgHistory & culture
A brief description of the intended culture and language


As in real life in Australia and New Zealand, the population of the state is primarily English speaking. However there may be some areas with different cultures, e.g. Japanese, Chinese, Korean, Italian, Greek,etc. This is due to the large number of immigrants of Peralia. But most official documents, road names, names of settlements, etc will be in English.

Noun Project drawing icon 2123401.svgPast mapping
To support your request provide links to areas of OGF mapping which showcase your mapping skill. Mapping relevant to the requested theme & geography is especially useful
The {{coord}} template can optionally be used to link to the OGF map - it results in a nice formatted link. Or you can paste in a URL.


City of Bauer - Wildewater (bauer/southbourne part) - https://opengeofiction.net/#map=12/-3.5537/169.7556&layers=B

Town of Ken's Crossing (typical 500-1000 people town) - https://opengeofiction.net/#map=15/-4.3872/169.2167&layers=B

Town of Forest Junction (500-1000 people) - https://opengeofiction.net/#map=15/-3.7383/168.2675&layers=B

Noun Project Signature icon 619326 cc.svgUsername & date
Sign with ~~~~ to enter this


Waterstealer (talk) 05:07, 26 March 2022 (UTC)

Noun project 579150 Conversation.svgDiscussion
Discussion for clarification & decision
  • Considering the existing mapping and climate of Clamash, please demote the "large mountain range" in the east to a series of larger rolling hills. (You are welcome to still use the hills for extraction industries, but they should not be "mountainous" in height.) --TheMayor (talk) 13:28, 26 March 2022 (UTC)
Feather-core-check-square.svg Territory application approved
Since the three Peralia applications are clearly intended to be a single unified territory rather than three separate-but-related projects as I initially suggested, I am approving the application for AR060-12 only at this time. (Please also note the above comment regarding the eastern "mountains".) If significant development occurs over the next six months, this project team will be eligible to request a second adjacent territory (if available) to expand the project. -TheMayor (talk) 13:28, 26 March 2022 (UTC)
As a reminder, this territory is part of the larger Deodeca collaborative project; coordination with other territory owners to determine issues of national scope will be required moving forward.